Category
6 articles
When researchers begin publishing on a new subject, Library of Congress Subject Headings are rarely ready to meet them. The structural lag between the emergence of new academic fields and the authorization of corresponding LCSH headings forces catalogers to improvise—and raises serious questions about whether the current approval process is equipped for the pace of 21st-century scholarship.
Across the United States, a quiet but consequential shift is underway in library cataloging practice. Academic institutions, tribal archives, public libraries, and specialized collections are supplementing—and in some cases openly replacing—standard Library of Congress Subject Headings with locally developed vocabularies designed to serve their specific communities. The movement raises urgent questions about the future of shared catalog infrastructure and the limits of centralized subject author
As patrons increasingly encounter information through Wikipedia, Google's Knowledge Graph, and collaborative digital platforms, the controlled vocabulary of Library of Congress Subject Headings faces a discoverability challenge it was never designed to meet. This practical guide examines the strategies US libraries are deploying to reconcile institutional authority control with the realities of how researchers actually search, and considers what subject indexing might look like as these two know
Thousands of Library of Congress Subject Headings have been deprecated, cancelled, or simply abandoned by the researchers who once relied on them. Examining these discarded terms—some offensive by contemporary standards, others merely archaic—reveals an institution in constant negotiation between historical continuity and cultural relevance. This article traces what the graveyard of obsolete headings discloses about shifting American values, evolving information-seeking behavior, and the persist
Every time a user searches a library catalog, they are navigating a system built on thousands of invisible decisions encoded in LCSH authority records. Scope notes, broader and narrower term relationships, and syndetic structures either open pathways to discovery or quietly foreclose them. This article examines how those structural choices play out in practice—and what information professionals can do to identify and address barriers hidden in plain sight.
A quiet but significant transformation is underway in how American libraries organize and expose their collections. Alongside the long-dominant Library of Congress Subject Headings, a growing number of institutions are piloting linked data frameworks, AI-assisted metadata tools, and community-driven vocabularies that promise to make discovery faster, more precise, and more inclusive. For librarians managing the shift and patrons who rely on catalog searches, understanding what is changing—and wh